You are in: Contents/ Workshop/Workshop on the Competition: Impact, Organization, Evaluation...     Quo Vadis, IPC-4? --- Proposals for the Classical Part of the 4th International Planning Competition     Stefan Edelkamp stefan.edelkamp@cs.uni-dortmund.de   Joerg Hoffmann hoffmann@informatik.uni-freiburg.de   IPC 2004 Probabilitic Planning Track: FAQ 0.1     Michael L. Littman mlittman@cs.rutgers.edu   Hakan L. S. Younes lorens@cs.cmu.edu   A Limited Extension of PDDL for Planning with Non-primitive Action     Biplav Srivastava sbiplav@in.ibm.com     In Defense of PDDL Axioms     Sylvie Thiébeaux thiebaux@cslws1.anu.edu.au   Joerg Hoffmann hoffmann@informatik.uni-freiburg.de Bernhard Nebel nebel@informatik.uni-freiburg.de   VAL's Progress: The Automatic Validation Tool for PDDL2.1 used in the International Planning Competition     Richard Howey r.a.j.howey@durham.ac.uk   Derek Long d.p.long@durham.ac.uk   Real-life Manufacturing Problems: A Challenge     Roman Bartak bartak@kti.mff.cuni.cz     Pipesworld: Planning Pipeline Transportation of Petroleum Derivatives     Ruy Luiz Milidi fmilidiu@inf.puc-rio.brg   Frederico dos Santos Liporace liporace@inf.puc-rio.brg Carlos Jos P. de Lucena lucena@inf.puc-rio.brg   Apollo 13: A Challenge Domain for the Planning Community     Carl Henrik Westernberg h.c.westerberg@sms.ed.ac.uk   John Levine johnl@inf.ed.ac.uk   Limits and Possibilities of PDDL for Model Checking Software     Stefan Edelkamp stefan.edelkamp@cs.uni-dortmund.de     Are We Comparing Dana and Fahiem or SHOP and TLPlan?     Subbarao Kambhampati rao@asu.edu     Position Paper: Topics for Future Planning Competitions     Sven Koenig skoenig@gatech.edu